美国最高法院近日裁决岳东晓起诉SUN侵权案
美国最高法院近日裁决岳东晓起诉SUN侵权案做出裁决。
http://www.petitiononline.com/ToUS_SCt/petition.html
下级法院的判决已经激起强烈公愤。
http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?ToUS_SCt&1
案件英文资料在：www.American-Justice.org
(本文发表于首页理财·房产·法律, 已被阅读17014次)
本文通告引用(Trackback)链接: /wp-trackback.php?p=48559
《美国最高法院近日裁决岳东晓起诉SUN侵权案》共11件评论
1. 匿名游客的评论
January 4th, 2009 at 10:32 pm
李建东大师发神功
盈啦
2. 匿名游客的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:45 am
被人欺负,华人应该团结一致才对啊!
3. Ming Wei的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
The case will have a profound effect on the protection of copyright including the copyrights of numerous American products worldwide.
4. Carl的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
The shabby treatment of pro-se litigants by the courts must stop. Dr. Yue has clearly stated the case for infringement of his copywrite rights, and the courts must permit genuine due process to go forward in this matter.
5. George Edward的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
United States District Court Judge should be removed from office for committing treason against the Constitution and fraud against the court. For denying due process at law to Dr.Yue. And other judicial crimes outlined under annotated within demanding minimal standard of conduct of our appointed judicial officers, as outlined under Title 28 of the United States code of laws. affecting federal judicial officers standard of care in the administration of their offices. 1. Secondly, United States District Court judges lose all jurisdiction over a case once it has been taken on appeal to & until such time as the judicial circuit appellate courts render a decision in writing and in the case is returned to the District Court clerk’s office. Check appellate procedures this judge should also be sued for his biased and prejudiced against Dr.Yue. Under color of law and authority.
6. Carol的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
This illegal court abuse is going on all over the USA. In San Diego the courts are a mess. Allowing purjury and many other laws to be broken. What next, please allow Dr. Yue to win this case.
7. Carol的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
To: The U.S. Supreme Court Justices
Dear Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Justice John Paul Stevens, Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, Justice David H. Souter, Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Ruth Bader Gin*****erg, Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Justice Samuel A. Alito:
We are writing to you regarding the case of Dr. Dongxiao Yue v. Sun Microsystems, et al., which is set for conference in January 2009 (Information of the case can be found at www.American-Justice.org and YouTube).
In November 2007, Dr. Yue sued defendants for pirating his PowerRPC software. Evidence included defendants’ internal documents showing Sun knowingly sold unauthorized and unlimited copies of PowerRPC to others. However, in March 2008, former U.S. District Judge Martin J. Jenkins dismissed Dr. Yue’s lawsuit without ruling on any of the copyright claims.
The District Court then awarded defendants $219,949.90 of attorneys’ fees and costs under Section 505 of the U.S. Copyright Act.
While Dr. Yue’s appeal is ongoing, on December 15, 2008, the District Court issued a Writ of Execution directing county sheriff to take possession of Dr. Yue’s assets (primarily his copyrights and his family home where his two young children live), despite Dr. Yue’s request for humanitarian consideration. Dr. Yue’s application for stay at the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal was summarily denied without any explanation.
Awarding software pirates under U.S. Copyright Act would encourage infringement of intellectual property and would be detrimental to U.S. economy. The lower courts should have provided Dr. Yue equal protection as other American copyright owners.
We respectfully request that your Honor carefully consider Dr. Yue’s arguments before the Supreme Court and make an equitable decision.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
8. Betsy的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
We must abide by the Constitution and rule of law, and protect Dr. Yue’s due process rights
9. John的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Dr. Yue has the truth and should be granted justice
10. Cheryl的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:47 pm
Dr. Yue has a Constitutional Right to be heard at a jury trial. The corruption and judicial misconduct in the U.S. Court system is a disgrace. Big business harms the small guy intentionally, and payoffs become a big question within the system.
11. lackman的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Give Dr Yue justice
美国最高法院近日裁决岳东晓起诉SUN侵权案做出裁决。
http://www.petitiononline.com/ToUS_SCt/petition.html
下级法院的判决已经激起强烈公愤。
http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?ToUS_SCt&1
案件英文资料在：www.American-Justice.org
(本文发表于首页理财·房产·法律, 已被阅读17014次)
本文通告引用(Trackback)链接: /wp-trackback.php?p=48559
《美国最高法院近日裁决岳东晓起诉SUN侵权案》共11件评论
1. 匿名游客的评论
January 4th, 2009 at 10:32 pm
李建东大师发神功
盈啦
2. 匿名游客的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:45 am
被人欺负,华人应该团结一致才对啊!
3. Ming Wei的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
The case will have a profound effect on the protection of copyright including the copyrights of numerous American products worldwide.
4. Carl的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:39 pm
The shabby treatment of pro-se litigants by the courts must stop. Dr. Yue has clearly stated the case for infringement of his copywrite rights, and the courts must permit genuine due process to go forward in this matter.
5. George Edward的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
United States District Court Judge should be removed from office for committing treason against the Constitution and fraud against the court. For denying due process at law to Dr.Yue. And other judicial crimes outlined under annotated within demanding minimal standard of conduct of our appointed judicial officers, as outlined under Title 28 of the United States code of laws. affecting federal judicial officers standard of care in the administration of their offices. 1. Secondly, United States District Court judges lose all jurisdiction over a case once it has been taken on appeal to & until such time as the judicial circuit appellate courts render a decision in writing and in the case is returned to the District Court clerk’s office. Check appellate procedures this judge should also be sued for his biased and prejudiced against Dr.Yue. Under color of law and authority.
6. Carol的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:41 pm
This illegal court abuse is going on all over the USA. In San Diego the courts are a mess. Allowing purjury and many other laws to be broken. What next, please allow Dr. Yue to win this case.
7. Carol的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
To: The U.S. Supreme Court Justices
Dear Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Justice John Paul Stevens, Justice Antonin Scalia, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, Justice David H. Souter, Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Ruth Bader Gin*****erg, Justice Stephen G. Breyer, Justice Samuel A. Alito:
We are writing to you regarding the case of Dr. Dongxiao Yue v. Sun Microsystems, et al., which is set for conference in January 2009 (Information of the case can be found at www.American-Justice.org and YouTube).
In November 2007, Dr. Yue sued defendants for pirating his PowerRPC software. Evidence included defendants’ internal documents showing Sun knowingly sold unauthorized and unlimited copies of PowerRPC to others. However, in March 2008, former U.S. District Judge Martin J. Jenkins dismissed Dr. Yue’s lawsuit without ruling on any of the copyright claims.
The District Court then awarded defendants $219,949.90 of attorneys’ fees and costs under Section 505 of the U.S. Copyright Act.
While Dr. Yue’s appeal is ongoing, on December 15, 2008, the District Court issued a Writ of Execution directing county sheriff to take possession of Dr. Yue’s assets (primarily his copyrights and his family home where his two young children live), despite Dr. Yue’s request for humanitarian consideration. Dr. Yue’s application for stay at the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal was summarily denied without any explanation.
Awarding software pirates under U.S. Copyright Act would encourage infringement of intellectual property and would be detrimental to U.S. economy. The lower courts should have provided Dr. Yue equal protection as other American copyright owners.
We respectfully request that your Honor carefully consider Dr. Yue’s arguments before the Supreme Court and make an equitable decision.
Sincerely,
The Undersigned
8. Betsy的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:44 pm
We must abide by the Constitution and rule of law, and protect Dr. Yue’s due process rights
9. John的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:46 pm
Dr. Yue has the truth and should be granted justice
10. Cheryl的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:47 pm
Dr. Yue has a Constitutional Right to be heard at a jury trial. The corruption and judicial misconduct in the U.S. Court system is a disgrace. Big business harms the small guy intentionally, and payoffs become a big question within the system.
11. lackman的评论
January 5th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Give Dr Yue justice
