这是你天真的想象!medicare的overhead高的可怕!

Yuval Levin makes a few points of relevance:

many of Medicare’s most significant administrative costs are just covered by other federal agencies, and so don’t appear on Medicare’s particular budget, but are still huge costs of the program. The IRS collects the taxes that fund the program; Social Security collects many of the premiums paid by beneficiaries; HHS pays for a great deal of what you would think of as basic overhead, but doesn’t put it on the Medicare program’s budget. Obviously private insurers have to pay for such things themselves. Medicare’s administration is also exempt from taxes, while insurers pay an excise tax on premiums (which is counted as overhead). And private insurers also spend a great deal of money fighting fraud, while Medicare doesn’t. That might reduce the program’s administrative costs, but it greatly increases its overall costs. Some administrative costs save money, after all: The GAO has estimated that a $1 investment in pre-payment review of claims, for instance, would save $21 in improper Medicare payments.

所有跟帖: 

totally BS! -老忽叔叔- 给 老忽叔叔 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/05/2012 postreply 08:35:35

看看,没道理就开始骂人,民主党标准形象。拿不到免费iphone,就骂街! -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/05/2012 postreply 08:36:34

只有你这种人才信这些BS的所谓“分析”。咱同样分析,军费,除了每年$1T,还有overhead。也加上。 -老忽叔叔- 给 老忽叔叔 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/05/2012 postreply 08:42:26

以我看,你们俩找个地方直接PK吧,让小鬼作裁判,派美作医护:D -徒劳- 给 徒劳 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/05/2012 postreply 08:42:48

不跟这种不想当总统的人PK。 -老忽叔叔- 给 老忽叔叔 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/05/2012 postreply 08:45:54

我一般只和年轻貌美女同学肉搏! -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/05/2012 postreply 08:50:43

战记如何? -ghost_in_shell- 给 ghost_in_shell 发送悄悄话 ghost_in_shell 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 10/05/2012 postreply 09:08:59

你要他怎么说?没经历只好胡编乱造。 -老忽叔叔- 给 老忽叔叔 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 10/05/2012 postreply 09:10:29

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!