如果您强调内容就应该给上下文。见内。

If push comes to shove, the Su-35 could feature prominently in any Chinese attempt to subdue Taiwan. The Flanker-E is arguably the PLAAF’s most capable fighter apart from the Chengdu J-20 stealth fighter, which is not likely to fully operational yet even if it has achieved some level of operational capability. Particularly, if the Su-35 is armed with long-range air-to-air missiles such as the very long range PL-15, it could be used to attack American aerial refueling tankers and other support aircraft such the E-3 AWACS that are crucial for conducting air operations over the vastness of the Pacific.

所有跟帖： 

• 而此并没有贬低J20的能力或推翻作者先前的句子 -thrawn- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2018 postreply 13:38:12

• 如果您这样理解，那就不争论了。到此为止。 -SDUSA- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2018 postreply 13:39:19

• 作者用了APART说明J20至少和Su35是同级。后句则说明因为J20还没有完全发挥全部的潜力。何来楼主的”看低J20“？ -thrawn- ♂ (123 bytes) () 09/03/2018 postreply 13:41:22

• 这不结了？J-20目前不如Su-35. 我讨论的是原文题目的翻译，用“照片”还是“苏35”，何来为楼主辩护？ -SDUSA- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2018 postreply 13:44:35

• which is not likely to fully operational yet even if it has achi -SDUSA- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2018 postreply 13:49:09

• 见上：http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/military/1564964.html -thrawn- ♂ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2018 postreply 13:50:02

• “目前”。 -SDUSA- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2018 postreply 13:49:59

• 目前作者认为是同级因为”apart“。然后给出了理由。apart不是”不如“。 -thrawn- ♂ (358 bytes) () 09/03/2018 postreply 13:51:11

• yet......even if..... 不争论了。 -SDUSA- ♀ (0 bytes) () 09/03/2018 postreply 13:54:17

• apart from-other than : besides, except for -thrawn- ♂ (291 bytes) () 09/03/2018 postreply 13:55:45