MCAT与GPA/专业没有明显的相关性,但与SAT有非常显着的相关性

来源: wzg69 2020-12-29 10:23:26 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (2623 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ wzg69 ] 在 2020-12-29 10:23:47 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

SAT考得高,MCAT就没问题?

https://forums.studentdoctor.net/threads/is-mcat-prep-about-hours-put-in-or-does-it-have-to-do-with-innate-ability.1431109/#post-22397831

I did take the old exam. All you needed back in my day was ~6 weeks to do either a review course or read a set of books. There were only a handful of discrete knowledge based questions, and maybe 1 page worth of equations to know. Maybe it changed significantly with the update.

Although, you'll notice there are many people out there who can briefly review and score in the top few percent, and many people out there who study up multiple times and consistently get non-competitive scores. I guess you could make up a logic there, like that a majority of college premeds don't know how to study, but then you'd still have to explain the narrow retest interval and why so many struggle to improve by studying more. As comparison for a knowledge based exam, the USMLE has massive intervals (16 point interval to contain 65% confidence) and doing more practice questions is the best predictor of scoring higher.

Compare that to MCAT. Brief search just turned up this small study - no significant MCAT correlation to GPA, major, etc but very significant correlations to SAT. Their value for SAT total to MCAT total was 0.45, which is quite good in the field of psychometrics; for comparison SAT verbal to MCAT verbal was 0.60 and that's about the highest you can find in studies like this.

It's not an IQ test in that it doesn't only test for g, but it's much more a passage based aptitude test than it is a content knowledge check.

Edit:

To throw a couple more sources in there:

1993 academic medicine, Montague and Frei - SAT was highest predictor of MCAT explaining 41% of variance (for comparison, all other model components including GPA collectively explained only 21% of variance)

1987 journal ntl med assc, Carmichael et al - SAT highest predictor explaining 57% of variance

So this has been a durable finding for decades!

 

所有跟帖: 

应该是吧,都是标考 :) -成功的兔- 给 成功的兔 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2020 postreply 10:27:30

专业没有相关性是显然的,GPA没有相关性比较意外,可能的解释只能是GPA padding -tibuko- 给 tibuko 发送悄悄话 tibuko 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2020 postreply 10:46:42

说明学校GPA差别太大吧 -wzg69- 给 wzg69 发送悄悄话 wzg69 的博客首页 (249 bytes) () 12/29/2020 postreply 10:53:16

GPA 永远都是用于学校内部比较,各学校各专业不同,无法简单比较。 -四娃兔妈- 给 四娃兔妈 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2020 postreply 10:58:05

學校内部GPA也差別很大,比如我一個同學爲了上法學院,找了不少大課上,大課傻人多,GPA容易高 -tibuko- 给 tibuko 发送悄悄话 tibuko 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2020 postreply 10:59:32

虽然一直否认,据说当年设计SAT是一种变相的测IQ, 所以,只要SAT达到一定分数,进入大学后念书一般都不会有问题,不知MCAT -trimtip- 给 trimtip 发送悄悄话 (393 bytes) () 12/29/2020 postreply 11:06:23

好像有道理,孩子两个都考得不错,自己说是因为会考试而已。这好像是咱们的特长,希望如此。 -孤鹜晚霞- 给 孤鹜晚霞 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/29/2020 postreply 12:36:24

加跟帖:

当前帖子已经过期归档,不能加跟帖!