今年4月陪审团决定被推翻的例子Harvey Weinstein Conviction Overturned by N.Y

本帖于 2024-06-01 09:18:59 时间, 由普通用户 bustout 编辑

Harvey Weinstein Conviction Overturned by N.Y. Court of Appeals

 

In a staggering 4-to-3 decision, the state’s highest court overturned the conviction of the disgraced movie producer, who in 2020 was found guilty of two felony sex crimes.

 

New York’s highest court on Thursday overturned the felony sex crimes conviction of the notorious Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, a staggering reversal of a bedrock case in the #MeToo era that prompted countless victims of sexual harassment and assault to come forward as accusers.

In a bitterly contested 4-to-3 decision, the New York Court of Appeals found that the judge who had presided over Mr. Weinstein’s case deprived him of a fair trial in 2020 by allowing prosecutors to call witnesses who said Mr. Weinstein had assaulted them — but whose accusations were not the basis for any of the charges against him.

Responding on Thursday, the Manhattan district attorney, Alvin L. Bragg, announced that he would seek to prosecute Mr. Weinstein again.

“We will do everything in our power to retry this case, and remain steadfast in our commitment to survivors of sexual assault,” a spokeswoman for Mr. Bragg’s office said. The case was originally prosecuted by his predecessor, Cyrus R. Vance Jr.

For Mr. Weinstein, 72, the immediate impact of the ruling might amount to little more than a change of scenery. He is likely to be transferred from the prison in Rome, N.Y., where he has been held since 2020, to a facility nearer to New York City, where he will await the filing of new charges. But the opinion also raised questions about whether a separate conviction in California — on rape and sexual assault charges — can survive a similar legal challenge.

That case, which saw Mr. Weinstein sentenced to another 16 years in prison in 2022, also relied in part on witnesses whose accusations did not lead to charges. Mr. Weinstein’s lawyer in the California case said she planned to file an appeal next month.

所有跟帖: 

谁说陪审团conviction 不可以被推翻, 陪审团决定永远是正确的。 -bustout- 给 bustout 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:16:04

陪审团认定无罪的,法官不能推翻。陪审团认定有罪的,当事人提出异议,法官重新审核后可以推翻有罪 -victor1988- 给 victor1988 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:24:25

法官審核的是證據,現在老川有能證明柯恩說謊的證據嗎?有的話這次庭審會不拿出來嗎? -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:28:18

12名陪审员并没有一致作出有罪的判断,法官不能知法犯法 -victor1988- 给 victor1988 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:37:01

恰恰相反,只要有一票認為無罪就會流審,之後要重組陪審團 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:41:20

只要闹到大选, 导致川普落选,目的就达到了. 至于是否案子被推翻, who cares? -Uusequery- 给 Uusequery 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:24:46

如果案件最終被推翻老川那時可以再參選 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:32:22

因程序問題發回重審,仍然很有可能罪名成立,如果證據沒有發生變化的話 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:23:20

还有地点. 出了NYC结果就可能不一样. -Uusequery- 给 Uusequery 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:25:48

那只能怪老川的法律團隊為什麼沒在開庭之前提出改變審理地點的動議 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:48:21

最高法可是以9:0判老川無權免受紐約州稅務調查,戈爾對小布什案戈爾一方要求擴大範圍重新點票本來就沒有什麼道理 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:34:02

科罗拉多州14修正案门 -bustout- 给 bustout 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:39:13

根本沒有可比性。科州裁決爭議點是老川有沒有被選舉權,紐約州誰也沒反對他有被選舉權 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 09:43:31

谁说高院只能判一模一样的的案, 给出一模一样的的结论? -bustout- 给 bustout 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 10:04:35

某些人和老川想得一样,就是老川提名他/她当大法官就该报恩,把法院当成是他家开的。大法官这个级别的人不会这样没有操守 -天青水蓝- 给 天青水蓝 发送悄悄话 天青水蓝 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 10:19:11

就是呀, 左左整天都是这样洗脑的呀。yes, yes, 扭腰陪审团无比正确, 不能改正。到此为止不在回帖 -bustout- 给 bustout 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/01/2024 postreply 10:38:01

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!