I try

来源: 中间小谢 2018-07-25 17:49:36 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (4080 bytes)
回答: 一点感想悟空孙2018-07-25 15:04:03

(no Chinese keyboard available at this moment)

“直接的存在”存在吗?
Of course, by definition, all existence is direct. Why should something exist indirectly?

要真正理解God is love就是形而上
Agreed in some way. In my opinion, God is an intermediate existence between men and direct existence, therefore by the definition above, God does not need to exist. In fact, the Buddhist way doesn't need God.

凡人能做到Love your neighbor as yourself已经很好了。
Strongly agreed. This is why I don't like people talking big but empty.
This is also why Confucianism has worked relatively well and endured long in China because it is practical for common people like most of us.

一切用文字记录的,只能限于“平庸笼统”,
Not true. For example Daoist and Buddhist ideas are recorded in their due worth. Just read 道德經 and 金剛經 , I think they carry a obvious spisitual sublimity, definitely not 平庸. And Western philosophy, logics, math and physics can be recorded accurately, definitely not 笼统.

。“仁其實就是一種慈悲心。是對萬物敞開的柔輭和信任的心。”就是你心里的“仁”,一百个人有一百个“仁”。
Ok. Here I am only speaking of the basics for one can not imagine 仁 without those qualities in my saying and vice versa.

作为形而上的认知系统,没有什么不足
Then why you think Chinese culture is so bad for it is some 认知系统  by your definition too?


 

 

所有跟帖: 

一点补充: -悟空孙- 给 悟空孙 发送悄悄话 悟空孙 的博客首页 (2919 bytes) () 07/26/2018 postreply 11:46:53

I think I can consider god a function. -中间小谢- 给 中间小谢 发送悄悄话 (73 bytes) () 07/26/2018 postreply 20:26:25

加跟帖:

  • 标题:
  • 内容(可选项): [所见即所得|预览模式] [HTML源代码] [如何上传图片] [怎样发视频] [如何贴音乐]