It is not just the words

It is also against whom you used the words. 云易 is against an idea, an abstract concept of Chineseness or Chinese culture. You, on the other hand, are using those words against 云易. There is a big difference there.
On top of the choice of words,  you are making a  judgment call : "我不应该说云易装盲，剩下的只有一个可能就是真盲了".  That sentence serves no purpose to support your argument, which is very good by itself. In fact, that line makes you less authentic because you didn't maintain an object attitude.

所有跟帖： 

• You obviously did not understand my article. -云易- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/07/2013 postreply 04:59:20

• That is not double standard. -ZoyaWashington- ♀ (510 bytes) () 12/07/2013 postreply 09:54:30

• Thanks ZoyaWashington for your 清醒。 -云易- ♀ (272 bytes) () 12/07/2013 postreply 04:58:08

• You have all the rights to defend for those people -ZoyaWashington- ♀ (283 bytes) () 12/07/2013 postreply 10:22:23