Lin attracts clicks, bloggers or "experts" will take advantages

来源: Warsteiner 2014-04-22 13:10:01 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (5152 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ Warsteiner ] 在 2014-04-23 06:58:56 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
As usual, there will be 2 extreme groups - over-praising and over-criticizing. The majority, though, will still be somewhere in the middle. Convincing ourselves how everyone out there is trying to get Lin, simply because of his ethnicity, or jealousy of his popularity among Asian fans, is too paranoid and insecure.

Here is what NBA.com has to say about last game, in the Notebook section:

HOT: Aldridge and Lillard combined for Portland's final 25 points in regulation en route to becoming the first teammates to go for at least 45 and 30, respectively, in a playoff game since Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen in 1992.

QUOTABLE II: "He's been a handful for us all season long, and we'll have to come up with a couple of new ways to try and get the ball out of his hands some, because we just didn't have any answers for him."
-- Rockets coach Kevin McHale on Aldridge

NOT: Harden and Parsons never found a groove from the outside, finishing a combined 6-for-25 (24.0 percent) from 3-point range.

GOOD MOVE: The Blazers successfully utilized the "Hack-A-Howard" technique to erase a double-digit deficit in the fourth period, as Howard missed four of six free-throw attempts before he was temporarily pulled from the game. Despite Howard's removal, Houston's offense sputtered in the short term with turnovers on back-to-back possessions.

BAD MOVE: Patrick Beverley became a tad too aggressive shortly after baiting Aldridge into his sixth foul. The 6-foot-1 guard seemed to forget that he, too, was in serious foul trouble and would be done for the night with one more slip-up. Lillard used Beverley's physical approach against him and attacked on the Blazers' first possession without Aldridge, forcing the officials to call Beverley's sixth foul.

Harden's shooting, Bev's foul trouble were mentioned as part of the reasons for the loss. No, Jeremy wasn't the scapgoat. 

Now, if you really want to look for negative opinions, you can always be "satisfied". It's Internet age, anyone with a keyboard can spit out some nonsense, just like I do. But I have come to accept that not everyone is going to agree with me, no matter how absolutely right I think I am. So,  why get worked up because of some negativity?

所有跟帖: 

还真诲人不倦啊?上网不就是找乐发泄吗?诺大个戏台,独乐乐不如众乐乐。 -soccermom- 给 soccermom 发送悄悄话 soccermom 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:17:37

你不能拦着我找乐吧?:) 我就喜欢说点废话,就是奔着众乐乐去的。 -Warsteiner- 给 Warsteiner 发送悄悄话 Warsteiner 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:20:19

请便!咱看戏,高兴时参一脚:) -soccermom- 给 soccermom 发送悄悄话 soccermom 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:25:31

这样多好,体坛和谐,上网灌水本来就是打发时间。 -Warsteiner- 给 Warsteiner 发送悄悄话 Warsteiner 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:29:55

不好,没了砖头就没了热闹。砖头向教主们的头上仍去•••••&#822 -soccermom- 给 soccermom 发送悄悄话 soccermom 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:49:18

小林的大合同就跟着放大镜,砖头也要有鲜花相伴:) -Warsteiner- 给 Warsteiner 发送悄悄话 Warsteiner 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:51:35

大顶,说的很好,没有人100%对或者100%错。NBA.com的评论平和中肯。 -一片老姜- 给 一片老姜 发送悄悄话 一片老姜 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:20:11

我说了NBA的赛后总结连小林的名字都没提。就是说的这篇。 -春蚕- 给 春蚕 发送悄悄话 春蚕 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:23:16

Jones 12-13, Batum 14-9, Matthews 18分,也都没提。摔锅 24-6 就被负面提了一下。 -Warsteiner- 给 Warsteiner 发送悄悄话 Warsteiner 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:28:51

我是劝老看客不要老说小林打得不错,在别人眼里不值一提。你们太敏感。 -春蚕- 给 春蚕 发送悄悄话 春蚕 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:33:26

老看客的表扬没问题,一边鼓励,一边找出很多要提高的地方。而不是与队友比贡献的表扬。 -talkatwxc- 给 talkatwxc 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:40:30

那是我错误理解。人家看小林,就是像我们看Batum这样的。 -Warsteiner- 给 Warsteiner 发送悄悄话 Warsteiner 的博客首页 (62 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:43:33

小林的表现既非最出色,也非最差劲。不提最好。 -一片老姜- 给 一片老姜 发送悄悄话 一片老姜 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:29:32

你很理性,同意。 -春蚕- 给 春蚕 发送悄悄话 春蚕 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:34:51

人怕出名猪怕壮。出名的结果就是免不了要多被议论,无论是好是坏:)) -老看客- 给 老看客 发送悄悄话 老看客 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 04/22/2014 postreply 13:27:51

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!