维基上还有一段对蒋的评价，我觉得很中肯，贴上来跟庞兄分享一下

“In recent years, there has been an attempt to find a more moderate interpretation of Chiang. Chiang is now increasingly perceived as a man simply overwhelmed by the events in China, having to fight simultaneously Communists, Japanese and provincial warlords while having to reconstruct and unify the country. His sincere, albeit often unsuccessful attempts to build a more powerful nation have been noted by scholars such as Jonathan Fenby and Rana Mitter. Mitter has observed that, ironically, today's China is closer to Chiang's vision than to Mao Zedong's. He argues that the Communists, since the 1980s, have essentially created the state envisioned by Chiang in the 1930s. Mitter concludes by writing that "one can imagine Chiang Kai-shek's ghost wandering round China today nodding in approval, while Mao's ghost follows behind him, moaning at the destruction of his vision".[97] Liang Shuming opined that Chiang Kai-shek's "greatest contribution was to make the CCP successful. If he had been a bit more trustworthy, if his character was somewhat better, the CCP would have been unable to beat him".[98]”


国人习惯于认为，既然一方被历史证明是错了，那当年他们的对手就是完全正确的。其实有时候双方都不尽如人意。。。如当年的国共两党，都是列宁式的专制政党，都有特务统治的味道，在大陆统治的时候都腐败（当然现在偶党是“青出于蓝”）；同时期的德国，可能上台的一个是纳粹，一个是共产党，都是反历史潮流的。所以俺不赞成颂圣于任何一方。我们拖着千年的封建传统前行，故转型举步维艰。。。