振奋人心:国际货币基金正式将中国列为世界最大经济体

来源: 薛成 2014-12-05 06:00:44 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (8787 bytes)

It’s official: America is now No. 2




Hang on to your hats, America.

And throw away that big, fat styrofoam finger while you’re about it.

There’s no easy way to say this, so I’ll just say it. We’re no longer No. 1. Today we’re No. 2. Yes, it’s official. The Chinese economy just overtook the United States economy to become the largest in the world. For the first time since Ulysses S. Grant was president, America is no longer the leading economic power on the planet.
 

It just happened — and almost nobody noticed.

The International Monetary Fund recently released the latest numbers for the world economy. And when you measure national economic output in “real” terms of goods and services, China will this year produce $17.6 trillion — compared to $17.4 trillion for the U.S.A.

As recently as 2000, we produced nearly three times as much as the Chinese.

To put the numbers slightly differently, China now accounts for 16.5% of the global economy when measured in real purchasing power terms, compared to 16.3% for the U.S.

This latest economic earthquake follows the development last year when China surpassed the U.S. for the first time in terms of global trade.

I first reported this looming development over two years ago, but the moment came sooner than I or anyone else had predicted. China’s recent decision to bring gross domestic product calculations in line with international standards has revealed activity that had previously gone uncounted.

These calculations are based on a well-established and widely used economic measure known as “purchasing power parity” (or PPP), which measures the actual output as opposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. So a Starbucks Venti Frappucino served in Beijing counts the same as a Venti Frappucino served in Minneapolis, regardless of what happens to be going on among foreign exchange traders.

Make no mistake. This is a geopolitical earthquake with a high reading on the Richter scale.

PPP is the real way of comparing economies. It is one reported by the IMF and was, for example, the one used by McKinsey & Co. consultants back in the 1990s when they undertook a study of economic productivity on behalf of the British government.

Yes, when you look at mere international exchange rates the U.S. economy remains bigger than that of China, allegedly by almost 70%. But such measures, although they are widely followed, are largely meaningless. Does the U.S. economy really shrink if the dollar falls 10% on international currency markets? Does the recent plunge in the yen mean the Japanese economy is vanishing before our eyes?

Back in 2012, when I first reported on these figures, the IMF tried to challenge the importance of PPP. I was not surprised. It is not in anyone’s interest at the IMF that people in the western world start focusing too much on the sheer extent of China’s power. But the PPP data come from the IMF, not from me. And it is noteworthy that when the IMF’s official World Economic Outlook compares countries by their share of world output, it does so using PPP, not mere exchange rates.

Yes, all statistics are open to various quibbles. It is perfectly possible China’s latest numbers overstate output — or understate them. That may also be true of U.S. GDP figures. But the IMF data are the best we have.

Make no mistake. This is a geopolitical earthquake with a high reading on the Richter scale. Throughout history, political and military power have always depended on economic power. Britain was the workshop of the world before she ruled the waves. And it was Britain’s relative economic decline that preceded the collapse of her power.

And it was a similar story with previous hegemonic powers such as France and Spain.

This will not change anything tomorrow or next week, but it will change almost everything longer term. We have lived in a world dominated by the U.S. since at least 1945, and in many ways since the late 19th century. And we have lived for 200 years — since the Battle of Waterloo in 1815 — in a world dominated by two reasonably democratic, constitutional countries in Great Britain and the U.S.A. For all their flaws, the two countries have been in the vanguard worldwide in terms of civil liberties, democratic processes, and constitutional rights.

 

 

所有跟帖: 

It is good news. But China needs to know that it still has a lot -2544- 给 2544 发送悄悄话 (9 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 06:51:55

同喜:经过几十年的努力,终于恢复了大清当年在世界上的经济地位。GDP第一也快了。 -不开窍- 给 不开窍 发送悄悄话 (138 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 07:33:47

刚看到,好消息 -cherryhill- 给 cherryhill 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 08:34:31

这没有实际意义。当年大清也是GDP 世界第一。什么时候中国能大量出口飞机,汽车,军火,中国才是真第一。 -asiancarp- 给 asiancarp 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 10:48:32

一步一步来嘛!不能一口吃个胖子。 -老生常谈12- 给 老生常谈12 发送悄悄话 老生常谈12 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 11:04:39

说的也是。啥第一也得一步一步来。希望尽快看到综合国力第一的那天。 -asiancarp- 给 asiancarp 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 20:51:59

大清GDP以农业为主,中国现在GDP的成份是健康的, 美国GDP其实军火与虚拟经济比例过高 -EY2008- 给 EY2008 发送悄悄话 EY2008 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 16:40:58

不见得。有许多是基础设施建设投资,一次性的,没有后续产出。GDP 只是参考,第一还是第八没有实际意义。综合国力才是真标尺。 -asiancarp- 给 asiancarp 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 20:50:15

基础投入也是后劲的基础,而且关键是这几年进步的趋势而不是孤立地看静态排名 -EY2008- 给 EY2008 发送悄悄话 EY2008 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 12/06/2014 postreply 01:08:48

没有什么振奋的。第一了,众矢之的,责任也多了,上门要钱的主儿多了。 -Xfollower- 给 Xfollower 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 12:54:24

历史上首次社会主义国家成为世界最大经济体 -- 一党专政,公有制主导的优越性。。。 -红烧茄子-- 给 红烧茄子- 发送悄悄话 (229 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 13:49:50

坚持了那么多年不露富,中国的GDP太大了,还是掩盖不住,哈 -正常读者- 给 正常读者 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 12/05/2014 postreply 20:25:35

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”