pointless argument

I recon you can't talk about wealth distribution in this forum as well as in America. None of the debaters hits the point of inequality of wealth distribution of China's economical success. Because that's a topic fundamentally socielistic and communistic. Track record of economical success doesn't prove anything about the legitimacy, efficiency and viability of the system at all. Maybe it's just a tempoary luck, since there is no general formula and theory in economy that can guarantee the success.The fact is, you have a billion people who started from zero life style with no private properties with barely fed stomach, and they were surpressed by the political system to have no chance for personal development but to fight as a soldier for the party during the coldwar. The very reason they are in large number is because the party needed to prepare for war casualty in large number under the shadow of all-out nuclare warfare. And all of sudden the cold war ends. The party can't sustain such a large man-power army, then decided to loosen the grip by allowing them to run for their own good (dismissed). The rest is the wild-west state of economy thus you got yourself a boom of economical success of China. So the success is a sheer legacy and momentum of war reserve. Not some political strategy or system that foresees it by design or desire. It's a contigent effect.