今天华盛顿邮报一篇文章, 呼吁应该实事求是地评价中国, 并与明天中午网上与读者互动

来源: wadcChinese 2010-03-01 13:05:42 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (12265 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ wadcChinese ] 在 2010-03-01 13:03:06 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.
今天华盛顿邮报一篇文章, 呼吁美国人应该实事求是地评价中国, 并与明天中午网上 与读者互动 转载者按: 两个作者根据自己在中国二十年的经历, 很及时的提醒美国人, 要认识真实的中国, 崛起但也危机重重. 文中提到中国是所有发达国家没有经历过的. 未富先老(想到计 划生育的后果吗? 以及最近的民工荒), 以及极端的水资源短缺和污染. 两位作者认为美国媒体最近大力宣扬中国的实力和威胁, 借以唱衰美国, 是少数 政治家别有用心. 有意思的是, 中国媒体, 似乎也很热衷唱衰美国, 并自以为已挤 身发达国家行列. (国家整体实力达到发达国家水平比人均生活水平达到发达国家水 平应该是两个完全不同的概念. 如果论打仗, 国家整体实力是很有关联的, 但居家过 日子, 还是用人均比较合理.) 从这方面讲, 两个国家都需要更多了解真实的对方. 就像孙子兵法里说的, 知己知彼, 才能百战不殆. 两位作者 Steven Mufson and John Pomfret, are reporters on the national staff of The Washington Post and former Post Beijing bureau chiefs. They will be online to chat with readers on Monday, March 1, at 12 p.m. Submit your questions and comments before or during the discussion. 附原文: There's a new Red Scare. But is China really so scary? By Steven Mufson and John Pomfret
Sunday, February 28, 2010

With the American economy struggling and the political system in gridlock, there is one thing everyone in Washington seems to agree on: The Chinese do it better. Cyberspace? China has an army of hackers ready to read your most intimate e-mails and spy on corporations and super-secret government agencies. (Just ask Google.) Education? China is churning out engineers almost as fast as it's making toys. Military prowess? China is catching up, so quickly that it is about to deploy an anti-ship ballistic missile that could make life on a U.S. aircraft carrier a perilous affair. The economy? China has gone from cheap-clothing-maker to America's banker. Governance? At least they can build a high-speed train. And energy? Look out, Red China is going green! This new Red Scare says a lot about America's collective psyche at this moment. A nation with a per capita income of $6,546 -- ensconced above Ukraine and below Namibia, according to the International Monetary Fund -- is putting the fear of God, or Mao, into our hearts. Here's our commander in chief, President Obama, talking about clean energy this month: "Countries like China are moving even faster. . . . I'm not going to settle for a situation where the United States comes in second place or third place or fourth place in what will be the most important economic engine in the future." And the nation's pundit in chief, Thomas Friedman of the New York Times, even sees some virtue in the Chinese Communist Party's monopoly on political power: "One-party autocracy certainly has its drawbacks. But when it is led by a reasonably enlightened group of people, as China is today, it can also have great advantages." In the past, when Washington worried about China, it was mainly in terms of a military threat: Would we go to war? Would China replace the Soviet Union as our rival in a post-Cold War world? Or we fretted about it as a global workshop: China would suck manufacturing jobs out of our economy with a cheap currency and cheaper labor. But today, the threat China poses -- real or imagined -- has flooded into every arena in which our two nations can possibly compete. And it's not just in Washington. Asked in a Washington Post-ABC News poll this month whether this century would be more of an "American century" or more of a "Chinese century," many Americans across the country chose China. Respondents divided evenly between the United States and China on who would dominate the global economy and tilted toward Beijing on who would most influence world affairs overall. "We have completely lost perspective on what constitutes reality in China today," said Elizabeth Economy, the director for Asia studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. "There is a lot that is incredible about China's economic story, but there is as much that is not working well on both the political and economic fronts. We need to understand the nuances of this story -- on China's innovation, renewables, economic growth, etc. -- to ensure that all the hype from Beijing, and from our own media and politicians, doesn't lead us to skew our own policy." Having lived in China during the past two decades, we have witnessed and chronicled its remarkable economic and social transformation. But the notion that China poses an imminent threat to all aspects of American life reveals more about us than it does about China and its capabilities. The enthusiasm with which our politicians and pundits manufacture Chinese straw men points more to unease at home than to success inside the Great Wall. This is not to say that China isn't doing many things right or that we couldn't learn a thing or two from our Chinese friends. But in large part, politicians, activists and commentators push the new Red Scare to advance particular agendas in Washington. If you want to promote clean energy and get the government to invest in this sector, what better way to frame the issue than as a contest against the Chinese and call it the "new Sputnik"? Want to resuscitate the F-22 fighter jet? No better country than China to invoke as the menace of the future. Take green technology. China does make huge numbers of solar devices, but the most common are low-tech rooftop water-heaters or cheap, low-efficiency photovoltaic panels. For its new showcase of high-tech renewable energy in the western town of Ordos, China is planning to import photovoltaic panels made by U.S.-based First Solar and is hoping the company will set up manufacturing in China. Even if government subsidies allow China to more than triple its photovoltaic installations this year, it will still trail Germany, Italy, the United States and Japan, according to iSuppli, a market research firm. China does have dozens of wind-turbine manufacturers, but their quality lags far behind that of General Electric, not to mention Europe's Vestas and Siemens. And although a Chinese power company has some technology that might be useful for carbon capture and storage, which many companies see as the key to cutting greenhouse gas emissions from coal plants, it has built only a tiny version to capture carbon dioxide for making soda, rather than exploring needed innovations in storage. If not for our economic distress, we might be applauding China's clean-energy advances; after all, one first-place position we have ceded to China is in greenhouse gas emissions. Limiting those emissions is a job big enough for both of our economies to tackle. But domestic anxieties have morphed into anxiety about China. "Every day we wait in this nation, China is going to eat our lunch," Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said this month. Arguing for nuclear power, as well as renewable energy sources and cleaner ways to use coal, Graham said: "The Chinese don't need 60 votes. I guess they just need one guy's vote over there -- and that guy's voted. . . . And we're stuck in neutral here." Like others, Graham emphasizes the China threat to propel his fellow lawmakers into action. "Six months ago, my biggest worry was that an emissions deal would make American business less competitive compared to China," he said on a different day. "Now my concern is that every day that we delay trying to find a price for carbon is a day that China uses to dominate the green economy." In other areas, politicians and pundits also have a tendency to overestimate China's strengths -- in ways that leave China looking more ominous than it really is. Recent reports about how China is threatening to take the lead in scientific research seem to ignore the serious problems it is facing with plagiarism and faked results. Projections of China's economic growth seem to shortchange the country's looming demographic crisis: It is going to be the first nation in the world to grow old before it gets rich. By the middle of this century the percentage of its population above age 60 will be higher than in the United States, and more than 100 million Chinese will be older than 80. China also faces serious water shortages that could hurt enterprises from wheat farms to power plants to microchip manufacturers. And about all those engineers? In 2006, the New York Times reported that China graduates 600,000 a year compared with 70,000 in the United States. The Times report was quoted on the House floor. Just one problem: China's statisticians count car mechanics and refrigerator repairmen as "engineers." We've seen this movie before, and it didn't end in disaster for the United States. Some decades ago, Americans were obsessed with another emerging Asian giant: Japan. People were so overwrought about the "threat" that autoworkers smashed imported Japanese cars. On June 19, 1982, a Chrysler supervisor and his stepson, who had been laid off from a Michigan auto plant, killed a Chinese American man they apparently thought was Japanese. Author Michael Crichton's 1992 potboiler "Rising Sun" summed up the nation's fears. In 1991, 60 percent of Americans in an ABC News/NHK poll said they viewed Japan's economic strength as a threat to the United States. But then something happened. Japan's economy lost its game. The 1990s became a "lost decade," so much so that during the toughest days of the recent financial crisis, Japan was invoked as a cautionary tale, lest we not do enough to jump-start our economy. Now, some experts, such as Kenneth Lieberthal, a former senior director for Asia at the National Security Council and a man who has taught us a lot about China, say using China's green-tech rise as an excuse to whip America into shape isn't such a bad idea, because the result -- a cleaner environment or a more high-tech workforce -- makes a lot of sense. And certainly it's better to compete on that than on the size of our respective militaries. But there is a certain irony to the new Red Scare. When we reported from China in the 1990s, some Chinese neoconservatives achieved rock-star popularity there for promoting the notion that the United States was conspiring to contain China, militarily and economically. They argued that global economic growth was a zero-sum game and that China's gain would be America's loss; as a result, Beijing had to be more assertive in its dealings with the United States. Legions of U.S. diplomats and business leaders said no, no, no. They assured China that the two nations could grow together. Americans tried to teach Chinese the meaning of the expression "win-win." And that is the way introductory economics courses teach it. As N. Gregory Mankiw, a former chairman of President George W. Bush's Council of Economic Advisers, writes in his popular textbook: Trade "is not like a sports contest, where one side wins and the other side loses. In fact, the opposite is true. Trade between two countries can make each country better off." And yet a sports contest -- or worse -- is exactly what the U.S.-Chinese relationship sounds like these days. In discussing energy at the Feb. 3 meeting with governors, Obama warned: "We can't afford to spin our wheels while the rest of the world speeds ahead." Speeding ahead is a worthy goal, but the United States does not need a bogeyman on its tail to get moving. What may seem like a throwaway line here could damage U.S. relations there, and there are enough reasons for tension with China without manufacturing new ones. As the Chinese strategist Sun Tzu said: "If ignorant both of your enemy and yourself, you are certain to be in peril." China is no enemy, but inflating the challenge from China could be just as dangerous as underestimating it.

所有跟帖: 

r u saying china's success is inflated by american -sh40- 给 sh40 发送悄悄话 sh40 的博客首页 (94 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

你真认为中国有很多"冒富大叔"? 等美国人打过来, 才发现搞错了 LOL -wadcChinese- 给 wadcChinese 发送悄悄话 wadcChinese 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

人民币发多了的缘故,如果真正比财富不一定,中国人的 -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (50 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

是的, 就像老顾, 住着几百万的豪房, 每天照样登自行车上班 -wadcChinese- 给 wadcChinese 发送悄悄话 wadcChinese 的博客首页 (62 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

财富(us dollar) saved in bank will be almost worthless -sh40- 给 sh40 发送悄悄话 sh40 的博客首页 (55 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

3:1? rmb:$=20:1 -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

知道这几天人民币兑美元跌了不?如果人民币升值,2万亿 -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (120 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

sooner or later it will be. within a decade. -sh40- 给 sh40 发送悄悄话 sh40 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

是你主观判断吧,中国这种经济模式10年能够转换好并立起来? -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

如果比较冷静地看的话,中国完全是一个经济殖民地,经济 -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (128 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

骑车既锻炼身体又减轻环境污染.当然,能骑车也说明家和办公室近 -爬墙党- 给 爬墙党 发送悄悄话 (11 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

the Benz the bimmer they r driving r all more expensive -sh40- 给 sh40 发送悄悄话 sh40 的博客首页 (51 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

嗯,在美国居家过日子,还是不错的,有汉堡包,大牛排, -europe- 给 europe 发送悄悄话 europe 的博客首页 (104 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

最关键的是资源,是对粮食,石油,铁矿,煤矿的控制 -爬墙党- 给 爬墙党 发送悄悄话 (252 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

有一定道理,但是你说的那些没有用的土地,下面可是有很多 -pudonghao- 给 pudonghao 发送悄悄话 (8 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

耕地面积少,但如果矿产丰富也好,但据说石油不多的。 -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (140 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

非常同意。:-) -pudonghao- 给 pudonghao 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

握手握手:-----))))) -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

只有一个优势就是劳动力多而且便宜,面积不能比,中国 -Oona- 给 Oona 发送悄悄话 Oona 的博客首页 (102 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

中国目前比不上美国的关键之处在对资源的控制和占有. -爬墙党- 给 爬墙党 发送悄悄话 (478 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

只有你这样的人喜欢佣人! -简单明了- 给 简单明了 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

中国在进步,是肯定的。即使占人口绝大多数的人,生活 -pudonghao- 给 pudonghao 发送悄悄话 (311 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

你忽略了一个最重要的东西 -义和团八旗军- 给 义和团八旗军 发送悄悄话 (154 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

顶这个!苏联/东欧输在了软件,而不是硬件。 -驭风而行- 给 驭风而行 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

俄国依旧是大国.至少比没有美英的欧洲和日本强. -爬墙党- 给 爬墙党 发送悄悄话 (41 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

因为盎格鲁撒克逊的先辈能干.有AAABCNI -爬墙党- 给 爬墙党 发送悄悄话 (261 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

德日不行?俄国更强?怎么比的? -驭风而行- 给 驭风而行 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

怎么比,互相打一架,公平合理吧. -爬墙党- 给 爬墙党 发送悄悄话 (65 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 13:03:06

中国是很在乎外界对自己的评价的 -wadcChinese- 给 wadcChinese 发送悄悄话 wadcChinese 的博客首页 (45 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 14:01:20

什么时候美国真正客观, -子英- 给 子英 发送悄悄话 子英 的博客首页 (30 bytes) () 03/01/2010 postreply 14:57:13

你什么时候"实事求是"? 中国对G8,G2嗤之以鼻。从不愿出头。 -纽约唐人- 给 纽约唐人 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 03/02/2010 postreply 04:33:38

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”