这本美国陆军人写的书比较仔细也更全面(美方的):Truth Tent and Fighting Front

来源: thrawn 2019-02-15 16:04:25 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (3730 bytes)
本文内容已被 [ thrawn ] 在 2019-02-15 16:05:15 编辑过。如有问题,请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

https://history.army.mil/books/korea/truce/fm.htm#cont

最后他也讲了停战前美国空军一直轰炸中国军的补给线有什么样的成果:

Thus, at the close of the shooting war the Communists were in fairly good condition, militarily speaking. Despite the large personnel losses of June and July, there were over a million Chinese and North Korean soldiers under arms in Korea. They were eating three meals a day as compared to two during the earlier stages of the war and were adequately clothed. The enemy transportation and communications systems had been continually bombed and harassed during the conflict, but the prodigious use of manpower, on the one hand, and camouflage, deception, and subterfuge, on the other, had permitted the Communists to maintain their forces at the front and to create stockpiles as well. The enemy armies were in a position to continue the limited type of warfare of the 1951-53 period for a considerable length of time if the need had arisen. 

因此,在枪击战结束时,共产党人在军事上处于相当良好的状态。 尽管6月和7月人员损失惨重,但在【半岛上】有超过一百万的中国和朝鲜士兵。 他们每天吃三餐,而在战争的早期阶段则是两餐,并且穿着得体。 在冲突期间,敌人的运输和通信系统一直受到轰炸和骚扰,但另一方面,人力资源的大量使用,伪装,欺骗和诡计,使共产党人能够在保持前线力量和创造库存。 如果出现需要,敌军可以在相当长的时间内继续1951年至1953年期间的有限类型的战争。 

 

作者最前面也写了:

The status quo was restored but was that enough? The North Koreans could reorganize and try again. Now seemed to be the propitious moment to destroy the enemy army and unify Korea. Prompted by the United States, the United Nations gave tacit approval in early October and the U.N. forces pushed northward against token resistance. The goal became military victory and political unification rather than repelling aggression and restoring the old situation. So quickly had the modest aims of June been expanded by the heady successes of September.

现状已经恢复,但那还够吗? 朝鲜人可以重组并再试一次。 现在似乎是摧毁敌军并统一朝鲜的有利时刻。 在美国的推动下,联合国于10月初默许并且联合国部队向北推进以只遇到了微小得抵抗。 这个目标成为军事胜利和政治统一,而不是排斥侵略和恢复旧的局面。 很快,6月的谦虚目标得到了9月份令人兴奋的成功。

(谷歌翻译)

这本书得花时间细看。我还没看全但是看到得可以很完整得回答你1951之后所有大小战斗的发生和结果并不是你所说美军指哪就打下哪,也不是中国军没有还手之力,等等。

你既然喜欢事实说事,我就满足你。

 
 

所有跟帖: 

红线部分不是正好证明了我的观点么。即联合国军的北进并非联合国军介入朝鲜时就预定的战略目标,只是在北韩已崩溃时联合国军的顺手牵羊。 -hkzs- 给 hkzs 发送悄悄话 (693 bytes) () 02/15/2019 postreply 16:18:06

这顺手牵羊就是战略已经变了。作者都写出联合国默许占领北韩而改变了战略。到此还继续狡辩无视事实? -thrawn- 给 thrawn 发送悄悄话 thrawn 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 02/15/2019 postreply 16:36:30

改变战略目标那么先前就不算了。这很清楚。这还值得狡辩? -thrawn- 给 thrawn 发送悄悄话 thrawn 的博客首页 (1309 bytes) () 02/16/2019 postreply 08:54:43

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!