太平洋战场的血战=之后朝鲜的拉锯战=绞人器

来源: thrawn 于 2019-02-13 07:34:45 [档案] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读：次 (2588 bytes)

本文内容已被 [ thrawn ] 在 2019-02-13 09:32:07 编辑过。如有问题，请报告版主或论坛管理删除.

回答: 相比中太平洋战场的血战，麦克阿瑟的这些战斗太轻松了。由 hkzs 于 2019-02-13 07:17:50

太平洋的岛屿血战是很惨得但也是美军以多胜少的仗。

而麦克阿瑟的新几内亚则都是以少胜多的战略战。

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Guinea_campaign

MacArthur would have liked to deny this area to the Japanese, but he had neither sufficient air nor naval forces to undertake a counterlanding. The Japanese at Rabaul and other bases on New Britain would have easily overwhelmed any such effort

http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/campaign_new_guinea.html

美国陆军自己的介绍：

https://history.army.mil/brochures/new-guinea/ng.htm

The campaign on New Guinea is all but forgotten except by those who served there. Battles with names like Tarawa, Saipan, and Iwo Jima overshadow it. Yet Allied operations in New Guinea were essential to the U.S. Navy's drive across the Central Pacific and to the U.S. Army's liberation of the Philippine Islands from Japanese occupation. The remorseless Allied advance along the northern New Guinea coastline toward the Philippines forced the Japanese to divert precious ships, planes, and men who might otherwise have reinforced their crumbling Central Pacific front.

哪里这么简单？你不是喜欢看战争事实么？为何选择性失明？