I am more interested in the "facts" not "assumption".

来源: Giantfan 2018-09-07 09:43:54 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (364 bytes)

Battles/wars are won by execution not by analysis or calculation.  Many circumstances affect the outcome.  Weaponry is merely one of the determining factors regardless of the nationality.  

What to achieve to assure readers that the potential threat is not worthy a threat, repeatedly?   

所有跟帖: 

Do whatever you want and think as you like. The fact is "The PL -SDUSA- 给 SDUSA 发送悄悄话 (125 bytes) () 09/07/2018 postreply 09:59:16

Indeed. They talk whatever they like. It is their job, though -Giantfan- 给 Giantfan 发送悄悄话 (111 bytes) () 09/07/2018 postreply 10:10:26

If that is true, why were you so angry? I just ZTed two article -SDUSA- 给 SDUSA 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/07/2018 postreply 10:15:26

Where and when did I express anger? -Giantfan- 给 Giantfan 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/07/2018 postreply 10:21:10

加跟帖:

  • 标题:
  • 内容(可选项): [所见即所得|预览模式] [HTML源代码] [如何上传图片] [怎样发视频] [如何贴音乐]