不是提前通知人家两次了吗？乔良将军还是不当将军的好。中国的问题在于应对的方法

假如印度设计的目的更大，吞了不丹， 攻入亚东。 还说要免战牌吗。 实际上，印度注视不丹的一举一动，一旦不丹有动摇，结果就是没有了不丹。 不丹为此加强自己的力量（保护皇室）。（****中国的情报能力有缺失****）。所以问题的根本不是中国修不修路。而是印度充分准备，利用了中国修路作为借口，达到它的直接的目的（stop中国修路），更好地控制不丹（不丹同中国的每年的边界谈判泡汤了。更不说中不以后的建交。不丹也抬出了1988， 1998年中不边界协议，你不能修路呀）。

中国措手不及，应对: （1）打（大打，中打，小打）；（2）压；（3）谈；（4）或压谈彼此交互；就有相应的外交和军事部署。

乔良将军， 你下课吧！

http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/doklam-road-pla-india-china-border-dispute/1/1046805.html

A People's Liberation Army (PLA) official has suggested it might not have been "the right time" for China to carry out its road construction in Doklam and get embroiled in a stand-off with India.

In a commentary, PLA Major General Qiao Liang also slammed the hawkish voices in China that had demanded strong action from Beijing to expel Indian troops in Doklam as "irresponsible", saying that "war should be avoided."

"If they had a clear understanding of China's strategic positioning," wrote Major General Qiao, welcoming the August 28 disengagement by both sides after 72 days, "they would know that the settlement...was one of the best results possible."