纽约时报:2008 结论

来源: 伤心藏南 2017-08-23 19:03:18 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (1499 bytes)

纽约时报:

Did Britain Just Sell Tibet?

Britain’s change of heart risks tearing up a historical record that frames the international order and could provide the basis for resolving China’s dispute with Tibet. The British government may have thought the issue of no significance to Britain’s current national interests and so did not submit it to public debate. But the decision has wider implications. India’s claim to a part of its northeast territories, for example, is largely based on the same agreements — notes exchanged during the Simla convention of 1914, which set the boundary between India and Tibet — that the British appear to have just discarded. That may seem minor to London, but it was over those same documents that a major war between India and China was fought in 1962, as well as a smaller conflict in 1987.

所有跟帖: 

这种也许是类似日本与台湾的关系……所以实质上的对质,,是中印之间的事…… -青松站- 给 青松站 发送悄悄话 青松站 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 08/23/2017 postreply 19:07:31

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”