证据相当清楚

来源: fourwaves 于 2016-06-05 09:01:26 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读： 次 (491 bytes)
回答: 一面之词而已 由 bridge008 于 2016-06-04 22:05:34

This evidence, however, is still questionable based on the discovery, in the Inquest and after, that Leibniz both back-dated and changed fundamentals of his 'original' notes, not only in this intellectual conflict, but in several others (he also published 'anonymous' slanders of Newton regarding their controversy which he tried, initially, to claim he was not author of)。

所有跟帖： 

• 搞了半天不还是一面之词么 -bridge008- ♂ 给 bridge008 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/05/2016 postreply 09:27:42

• 那天到波兰国家图书馆看莱的笔记本 -fourwaves- ♂ 给 fourwaves 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/05/2016 postreply 09:37:53

• 莱和朋友的通信里也有记录，这个已经不是争议了。争议是以前的事，为牛顿争名分 -bridge008- ♂ 给 bridge008 发送悄悄话 (131 bytes) () 06/05/2016 postreply 09:46:07

• 记录的时间与内容很重要，不是向你这样三言两语就打发过去 -fourwaves- ♂ 给 fourwaves 发送悄悄话 (50 bytes) () 06/05/2016 postreply 14:19:16

• 这个就不用争了吧，现在公认莱布尼茨独自创立的为微积分理论 -bridge008- ♂ 给 bridge008 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 06/05/2016 postreply 18:24:21

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！