I am just very curious to know

why this wasn't found by the internal technical check by the journal Nature?

Normally, for my research area, a submitted manuscript is first checked by the journal through a so-called technical check to ensure there is no any obvious plagiarism issue. They use some software like turnitin with a massive database to do the comparison.

In my University, even the unergraduate's assignment report is first screened by turnitin prior to being checked by us. What a laugh that Riken even does not have such a function or hire the staff who are in such a low scientist moral. 

All ends up with a big mess by this tricky lady.  

所有跟帖： 

• 理研的论文都是个人投稿的，并不通过研究所。 -静斋居士- ♂ (134 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 00:20:22

• 她不会捏着一条带有s生理 -王翠花- ♀ (70 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 00:44:33

• 厉害！ -静斋居士- ♂ (59 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 00:53:00

• 你没被日本女学生勾引过？ -王翠花- ♀ (12 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 01:02:36

• 犀利呀！经你一点拨，好象真有她把他们都收服了的感觉。 -喜爱温泉- ♀ (12 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 01:21:26

• 大凡这种4，50岁的大叔，年轻时光顾学习没好好恋爱过。于是她就把他们都收服了！ -王翠花- ♀ (0 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 01:43:17

• 4，50岁的大妈，不一样也要找小11岁的，呵呵。 -静斋居士- ♂ (36 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 02:10:54

• 这个有些落后，现在都是捏着一叠艳照 -人约黄昏后- ♀ (34 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 20:08:57

• 知識分子一枝花 -飯盛男- ♂ (23 bytes) () 04/01/2014 postreply 20:15:45