您的位置: 文学城首页 » 热点讨论主题 » 投资理财 » 理财 » That arguments is not correct

That arguments is not correct

来源: [] [博客] [旧帖] [转至博客] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读:
回答: my point was "GROWTH" than preservation大家帮我买房2012-03-06 19:46:57

In 2000, 1 share of DJIA is 40 oz of gold. today it is 8 oz of gold.

In 2000, as an example, a Honda Accord is about $22000/$300 = 73 oz of gold.

today, a Honda accord is about $26000/$1650 = 15 oz of gold.

Does gold gain "growth"?

In any period of cycle, one asset class outperform the other asset class. It happens in last decade, gold outperform stocks, bonds and real estates. It also outperform Berkshire Heatherway shares.

We do not know next decade. It is anyone's guess.

A typical commodity bull market runs about 15-20 years.

所有跟帖: 

• 回复:That arguments is not correct -大家帮我买房-给 大家帮我买房 发送悄悄话 大家帮我买房 的博客首页 大家帮我买房 的个人群组 (531 bytes) () 3/6/12 22:58:33

加跟帖: 

笔名: 密码(可选项): [ 注册笔名 ]
标题:
内容(可选项): [所见即所得|预览模式] [HTML源代码] [如何上传图片] [怎样发视频] [如何贴音乐]
图  像 (可选项):
图  像2(可选项):
图  像3(可选项):