回复:多谢8老师, 再请问一下这个"相似领域"的依据出处在那里?

可以告知原文在哪里吗?

-See "American Competitiveness in the 21st Century Act (AC21) 106(c)":

(j) JOB FLEXIBILITY FOR LONG DELAYED APPLICANTS FOR ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS TO PERMANENT RESIDENCE.— A petition under subsection (a)(1)(D) for an individual whose application for adjustment of status pursuant to section 245 has been filed and remained unadjudicated for 180 days or more shall remain valid with respect to a new job if the individual changes jobs or employers if the new job is in the same or a similar occupational classification as the job for which the petition was filed.

按现在看来的话,不管怎么样都要和research相关是吧.举个例子,假如工作是在医药公司推广仪器和试剂,并不真正做实验, 会怎么样呢?

-Read this article "Similar Job" part:

http://www.immihelp.com/greencard/adjustmentofstatus/changing-employer.html

最主要还是不清楚判断标准.

- When making a determination if the new employment is the “same or similar” occupational classification in comparison to the employment in the initial I-140, adjudicators should consider the following factors:
A. Description of the job duties contained in the ETA 750A or the initial I-140 and the job duties of the new employment to determine if they are the “same or similar” occupational classification.
B. The DOT code and/or SOC code assigned to the initial I-140 employment for petitions that have a certified ETA 750A or consider what DOT and/or SOC code is appropriate for the position for an initial I-140 that did not require a certified ETA 750A. Then consider the DOT code and/or SOC code, whichever is appropriate for the new position to make a determination of “same or similar” occupational classification.
C. A substantial discrepancy between the previous and the new wage.
You can find SOC occupational codes here:

所有跟帖: 

谢谢,看来就是说以SOC code为准 -水晶小鱼- 给 水晶小鱼 发送悄悄话 (1152 bytes) () 09/23/2011 postreply 14:27:08

回复:谢谢,看来就是说以SOC code为准 -863211- 给 863211 发送悄悄话 863211 的博客首页 (998 bytes) () 09/23/2011 postreply 15:30:58

明白了, 多谢! -水晶小鱼- 给 水晶小鱼 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/23/2011 postreply 20:05:30

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!