KNDI 投资者们还是把吉利看成了雷锋叔叔

来源: 2014-01-01 12:05:36 [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读:

瞧瞧你们说的, 可你们想过没有, 康迪为啥要找吉利合作? 还不是资金不足实力不够, 对不对?

你现在找人帮忙, 就要将来有回报, 连这种起码的道理还不懂?

吉利这几天也没坏消息。  要说到政府的补贴, 康迪就没有吗? 每政府补贴, 哪个电动车公司能活下去?

吉利在香港上市, 在美国只是“代办”, 没量正常。


还有, 这种电动车租车生意还是没法和租自行车或传统车相比, 因为现在的电动车没法快速充电(也没充电站), 很多跑在半路就没电了咋办?自行车和传统车没这个问题。

如果要靠电动车来取代汽油车, 那将是中国环境的灭顶之灾 ! --  电池产量需要几十倍几百倍增长,如此大批量的电池生产, 你自己想去吧,  这种灾难越早阻止越好。



>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
10things said:

Kandi只是和Geely合作生产这种电车,但是租车的生意是Kandi的,没有Geely啥事。

“For just $3.25 per hour, you can rent one of the Kandi cars. They are built in partnership with Geely, best known in the west as the company that bought Volvo.”

至于,吉利,读了最近的一篇评论,吉利收到的政府subsidies相当于40%的利润,我想,这点可能很让美国投资者顾虑。吉利每天的量这么小,从TA的角度上说,momentum不到,不值得现在投资或投机。
Geely is also a major beneficiary of Chinese government subsidies. As a percentage of revenue, Geely gets more subsidies than any other automaker (about 4% of sales), and subsidies have made up as much as 40% of pre-tax profits in recent years. About 80% of these subsidies are tied to R&D or tax refunds, but investors need to recognize at least the risk that China will reduce or cease these payments at some point in the future.