EB1a要求补材料, 关于Evidence of the beneficiary’s original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field.
The petitioner has provided
- Evidence of Patents being issued to projects that the beneficiary contributed to
- Citation listings for the beneficiary
- Articles that the beneficiary authored or coauthored
先问个小问题, 请问这里第(1)点中的projects是什么意思, 不是指基金项目的projects吧?
请问获得基金资助是不是不算Contributions, 我Exhibit中还有一个”Other Evidences of Significant Original Contributions”, 这里包括我获得的项目情况, 在让我补材料的信中没有提及, 感觉评审人像是按照我的Exhibit的内容来讲的. 请教大家.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show that the beneficiary’s contributions are considered to be of major significance in the field of endeavor. Evidence has been provided to show that the beneficiary has made contributions to field but additional evidence is required to determine if these contributions are of major significance. To assist in determining whether the beneficiary’s contributions are original and of major significance in the field, the petitioner may submit:
- Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s contribution to the field.
- Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the beneficiary’s work important.
- Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary’s contributions of major significance.
- Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s) has provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
- Evidence of the beneficiary’s works being implemented by others. Possible evidence may include but is not limited to:
Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
Licensed technology being used by others;
Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
要求补的上面这几点, 我是特别无助, 第(5)点肯定没有. 第(2)和第(3)点, 又有什么区别?
针对第(4)点, 应该从哪方面说明, 另外请教,论文被引用的国家地区分布的小灯图, 是不是可以把所有论文的被引都算上一起作一个灯图.
问题有点多, 实在是麻烦大家了, 谢谢.
