第三篇文章的评论有保留

在 http://backreaction.blogspot.com/2014/09/black-holes-declared-non-existent-again.html 这篇文章的最后，作者说：


In summary, the recent papers by Mersini-Houghton and Pfeiffer contribute to a discussion that is decades old, and it is good to see the topic being taken up by the numerical power of today. I am skeptic that their treatment of the negative energy flux is consistent with the expected emission rate during collapse. Their results are surprising and in contradiction with many previously found results. It is thus too early to claim that is has been shown black holes don’t exist.

这一小段大意是：“我对他们的对于负能量流的处理有保留，怀疑事是否与预测的在崩溃时的发射率一致。他们的结果与许多已有的结果不一致。现在还为时尚早就声称已经证明了黑洞不存在。”

一个物理现象被发现，被否定是常有的事情。只有经过多次的反复才能比较接近真相。物理学杂志发表的文章，虽然比经济学心理学的严格得多，但是也不是没有错误。