彭博社评论比闾丘露薇和《铿锵三人行》公正多了。

闾丘露薇认为华裔抗议是反美情绪，《铿锵三人行》则顾左右而言它刻意回避事件本质。闾丘露薇和《铿锵三人行》的评论，都有很明显的为JK洗地擦屁股的倾向，都是变相贬低华裔保护自身安全抵制种族歧视言论的合法行为。

相反，彭博社评论就比较客观了。彭博社评论指出JK剧就是一个不该播放的节目 （ It’s an offensive segment, and one that Kimmel and his producers should never have allowed to air.）彭博社评论完全理解华裔愤怒的抗议，认为6岁小孩也不应该说出种族灭绝的叫嚣（ it’s not hard to understand why the Chinese and Chinese-American communities were so upset. Nationally televised jokes about racial extermination, even when made by six- and seven-year-olds, are rarely funny, especially if they’re directed at you. Even though to Americans (and probably to Kimmel) it might sound over the top to claim a child was publically advocating genocide, that’s what many Chinese heard.）

同样是新闻评论，都是就事论事，点评时事。对于JK剧言论的点评，彭博社评论员就不讳言其反人类种族主义的事实，而闾丘露薇和《铿锵三人行》却昧着良心为JK开脱。

此为彭博社评论员文章链接




更多我的博客文章>>>

• 赵先生在奥兰多卫报发表英文评论，向主流解释华裔抗议JK的情理
• 彭博社评论比闾丘露薇和《铿锵三人行》公正多了。
• 毗卢遮那佛咒（梵唱）
• 洛杉矶桑塔莫妮卡海滩（歌曲视频）
• 现在不抗议JK辱华言论，以后可能就来不及了