NY Post Endorses McCain, Slams Obama "Tissue-thin resume"

来源: californiairis 2008-09-08 18:47:57 [] [博客] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (4337 bytes)


Reasons include Obama's "Tissue-thin resume"


There are many reasons to support the McCain-Palin ticket. Here are but a few:

* National security: The differences between McCain and Obama are especially stark.

McCain says 9/11 represented a two-decade "failure . . . to respond to . . . a [growing] global terror network." He understood that Iraq is a critical front in the war on terror - and he urged perseverance even in the dark days that preceded the success of "the surge."

Obama backed policies that would have abandoned Iraq to its fate, he bitterly opposed the surge, and once insisted that US forces invade Pakistan in search of Osama bin Laden - seemingly without regard for the potential consequences of attacking a nuclear-armed nation, ally or not.

Regarding a nuclear Iran, McCain has pushed for the strongest possible international sanctions and diplomatic pressure. Obama opposes sanctions.

And, when Russia invaded the former Soviet republic of Georgia, threatening a return to the Cold War, McCain reacted with stern disapprobation: "We must remind Russia's leaders that the benefits they enjoy from being part of the civilized world require their respect for the values, stability and peace of that world."

Obama called for UN action - unaware, apparently, that Russia's Security Council veto would have prevented any.

* Taxes: McCain knows that when government absorbs ever-larger shares of national income, the economy suffers.

High tax rates diminish investment, killing jobs and stunting growth.

And while Obama promises tax cuts for "95 percent" of Americans, what he actually is proposing is some $650 billion in tax-credit-driven hikes in entitlement and other spending, to be paid for with heavier imposts across the board, but especially on investment - like a sharply higher capital-gains tax.

This is bad news for the millions of ordinary Americans who own stocks, either personally or through pension funds or who plan someday to sell their homes or other real property.

McCain, wisely, vows to keep capital-gains taxes at 15 percent and to keep the Bush-era tax cuts in place - understanding that new growth will boost revenue, and promising to make up the rest with spending restraint.

And he's called for a one-year freeze on most discretionary spending and an end to pork-barrel giveaways.

* Trade: "I object when Senator Obama and others preach the false virtues of economic isolationism," says McCain - noting that "globalization is an opportunity" for US workers. He adds that while emerging economies like those of China and India are worrisome, the answer is competition informed by education and innovation - not protectionism.

* Energy: On the economic issue most vexing Americans today - energy prices - McCain is aggressive

He is a strong convert to offshore drilling: "We have trillions of dollars' worth of oil and gas reserves in the US at a time we are exporting hundreds of billions of dollars a year overseas to buy energy."

He also strongly backs nuclear power - a carbon-free form of energy that America can produce relatively cheaply.

Obama, meanwhile, hews to the Democratic Party line on energy: no nukes, no drilling and no comprehension of the consequences of such policies.

None of this implies an iota of disrespect toward Obama. It took a formidable candidacy to defeat Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton - a candidacy, by the way, which we strongly supported earlier this year.

And the intelligence, the organizational skills and the ability to communicate that Obama demonstrated from the beginning dramatically underscore the history that is being made by the first African-American to head a major-party presidential ticket.

He should be around for a long time, and we hope that he is.

In the end, though, sound security, economic and energy policies - plus allegiance to principle - are critical to keeping America safe and strong.

On all counts, John McCain and Sarah Palin understand this - and that's why we're in their corner to the finish.

所有跟帖: 

When did NY Post endorse a democratic candidate? -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/08/2008 postreply 18:48:50

I enjoy the "tissue-thin resume" remark -californiairis- 给 californiairis 发送悄悄话 californiairis 的博客首页 (73 bytes) () 09/08/2008 postreply 18:53:43

It is exactly what you get from a conservative newspaper. -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (451 bytes) () 09/08/2008 postreply 18:59:04

I enjoy reading NY Post. But National Review is the best -baiwen- 给 baiwen 发送悄悄话 baiwen 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/08/2008 postreply 19:03:09

Of course. They are both extremely conservative papers. -riley- 给 riley 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/08/2008 postreply 19:10:58

No. You can't compare fair and high quality with 6 page gossip -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/08/2008 postreply 19:12:34

Ok I back off. Everyone has his/her favorite. I like WSJ and NYT -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/08/2008 postreply 19:16:14

Me too, actually :-) -riley- 给 riley 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 09/08/2008 postreply 20:54:30

Don't you know WSJ is also conservative? -小囡妈妈- 给 小囡妈妈 发送悄悄话 小囡妈妈 的博客首页 (32 bytes) () 09/08/2008 postreply 21:17:55

different. WSJ never mixes news with political comments. -用户名被占用了- 给 用户名被占用了 发送悄悄话 用户名被占用了 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 09/09/2008 postreply 06:14:15

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”