悲观地说，美国能够纠正选举系统问题的希望，十分渺茫

这样的recount，能起到什么作用？

“Wisconsin permitted individual counties to decide whether to provide paper ballots for recount or merely to rerun the same computer totals.^[10][11] A recount in Michigan was allowed to proceed for three days before being halted by court order,^[12] and a federal lawsuit to compel a recount in Pennsylvania was dismissed.^[13]While the partial Michigan recount did unearth some instances of improper ballot handling and possible voter fraud,^[14] no indications of widespread hacking were discovered, and the overall outcome of the election remained unchanged, despite the evidence that the voting machines were old and faulty, possibly counting as "blank" ballots many that contained visually clear indications of presidential choice.^{[15][16][10][11]”}

^{https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election_recounts}

所有跟帖： 

• 因为很多问题涉及立国基础的，纠正了就不是现在的美国了。我不相信所谓大规模舞弊，但选举就是只适合君子国哦，烂人秒变泥塘 -柴郡猫- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/11/2020 postreply 06:06:30

• recount 用处不大。因为好多是通过harvest 选票 ，放进去的。查不出来。 但至少给以后有震慑作用 -Changshi- ♀ (0 bytes) () 11/11/2020 postreply 06:10:53

• 要查是一定查得出来。 -凊荷- ♀ (29 bytes) () 11/11/2020 postreply 06:22:26

• 选制有利于共和党，改为一人一票直选的话共和党以后胜选的希望更小 -iCall- ♂ (218 bytes) () 11/11/2020 postreply 06:35:17