I do not support Tibet independence. Do not mix independence

with autonomy. There is a politically critial difference between the two.

I support Da Lai solely because he claimed he has committed Tibet being part of China. Without this committment, I could not have supported him

Why cannot CCP take his claim for face value and start negotiation and then hold him responsible for future of Tibet and this very sensitive ethnic relationship in China? I strongly hope that CCP can have open dialogue with Da Lai. Provided that Tibet is part of China, everything is negotiable.

The open dialogue between CCP and Da Lai, if started, should be in full international view. Nothing hide. What CCP wants and What Da Lai wants. What are the exactly details of autonomy he means? That way, it helps reconcile a lot of differences and clear up many confusions. It will ultimately render a peaceful and mutual acceptabe agreement.

But CCP is too obsessed with control. Tibet is a very special case. They can not handle it in their usual way.