It's 4 times as big as a EPM2, and double the weight.

来源: LAChinese 于 2014-08-19 13:53:22 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读： 次 (212 bytes)
5.0x3.8x3.1=58.9 cubic inches vs 4.2x2.5x1.3=14 cubic inches, and 16 oz vs 9.5 oz.

Its lens is 3 times as big and as heavy as EPM2 lens, too.

It's not as convenient as EPM2.

所有跟帖： 

• 现在要方便就是手机了 -大大V- ♂ 给 大大V 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/19/2014 postreply 14:43:45

• True, nowadays 90% of my pictures were taken by IPhone. -LAChinese- ♂ 给 LAChinese 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 08/19/2014 postreply 16:37:20

请您先登陆，再发跟帖！

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”