Diamonds have 64 facets and reflect light, which is dazzling! Since self-media beings drive more than 64 facets, so much like reflecting light on diamonds, thereby prompting that I often read the comments of a blog post before I go on to its text to find the reasons to refuse or invest my time. Does that practice make any sense?

Go with the flow: One in a thousand blog readers write a blog; 1% of readers would make comments, as shown by statistics. So, reading comments prompts, you got top 1% there valuable. Don't you think so? Why love diamonds?

钻石有64个切面而折光反光,令人眼花瞭乱! 自媒体众生相比钻石更驱多于64个切面而折光反光: 我常从评论读起而找思路缘由读正文。

千分之一的博客读者写blog, 1% readers comment - so valuable. Don't you think so? 为什么爱钻石? 

Zuànshí yǒu 64 gè qiēmiàn ér zhéguāng fǎnguāng, lìng rén yǎnhuā liǎo luàn! Zì méitǐ zhòngshēngxiàng bǐ zuànshí gèng qū duō yú 64 gè qiēmiàn ér zhéguāng fǎnguāng: Wǒ cháng cóng pínglùn dú qǐ ér zhǎo sīlù yuányóu dú zhèngwén. Qiān fēn zhī yī de bókè.

Ref: 

诚理角节,只写一点specific不及其余: 只写一点才可specific, e.g., ? 楼