Talking with some senior immigrants, I got that as they told me: without politically correct (PC), you don't have a door to go to any play rooms - never mind you want following the play rule for fair play. You think you can do better without PC but by your talent to get ahead - you're naive and so ignorant about the history of the US.
The US is like a castle, the door is selectively open to certain people. Even you're in, you're selectively inviated to certain play room. Only a few got invited to the room of King David, you may stand around there - only a few lucky souls got invited to seat by the round table (decision-making).
Be patient - it takes time to be tried out to see if you're worth trusting. Either blacks or Mexicans are the children of Caucasians. Asians are neither of both ethical groups.
Be hold. wait for your turn.
Leaving aside the intended malice, I actually think "White Supremacist" is not bad semantically. White supremacy, in the sense of a society in which key decisions are made by white Europeans, is one of the better arrangements History has come up with. There have of course been some blots on the record, but I don't see how it can be denied that net-net, white Europeans have made a better job of running fair and stable societies than has any other group
博主回复(2016-3-20 08:54):http://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-2649160-948229.html
我在这里有生物学的解释。
还有东北亚 人 的人与人 之间的 差别 小 i.e. small standard deviation.
Both physically, and also mentally, 欧裔人 bigger SD, physically and mentally.
>> they are more likely to produce extremely smart individuals.
另外一种有趣 不一定正确 的讲法 是 中国的 历史 eliminated rebellious elements.
因此中国人比较passive.
>>另外 是 欧裔人 男性有 更高一点的 雄性激素,给他们 更多的 drive.
but the SD theory seems quite valid. 世界上大多数 天才 说 欧裔。