You're 纳税人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
In reality, a country like China size, the government should never try to mobilize all to get a Nobel Prize, to do basic research with massive money - it's impossible. Let the nature takes course: If you're Nobel material, you'll pan out regardless. Some leaders don't realize how much power they have - I'd pray for their wisdom to lead the public to a productive journey 中国崛起.
********************** Source of Inspiration ********************************************
屠呦呦施一公解读纳税人, 纳税人解读屠呦呦施一公: 这种互动有利科学大环境。If you can't explain your science in plain language, so simple that laymen can understand - you don't know your science at all. You can't live in an ivory tower if you use the money from tax payers - it's your responsibility to get back to those tax payers. Vice versa - you can't complain if as tax payers you don't ask about science.
科学家学会解读纳税人纳税人解读科学家, -才是中国崛起, 才不是被牵着鼻子走。
****************** Source of Inspiration*************************
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:07):Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some science elites don't think much about tax payers' benefit.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:15):That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:20):You're 纳税人 - I can see your point. That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:10):Sorry. Can you make it better? Here is my clarification: Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:21):You're 纳税人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:18):"纳税人是什么人?可不像投资人那么好定义。在我看来不是普通百姓." That's quite bizzar - anyone who pays tax is 纳税人 (including sale tax) -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:24):科学家也是纳税人! That's true, but how much tax a scientist pay? How much a scientist use? That proportion takes the obligation! If a scientist use more than he pays - that carry the obligation!
You're 纳税人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:26):That's true, but how much tax does a scientist pay? How much does a scientist use? That proportion takes the obligation! If a scientist uses more than he pays - carrying the obligation!
You're 纳税人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:12):That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:12):That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:26):You're 纳税人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:33):You're sharp! Well said! You got my point! 羊群效应理论(The Effect of Sheep Flock),也称羊群行为(Herd Behavior)羊群心理 herd instinct: 從眾效應或樂隊花車效應(Bandwagon effect)是指人們受到多數人一致性思想或行动的影響,而跟從大眾的思想或行為,常被稱為「羊群效應」。 也称“跟风效应”,英文中将其描述为:TheGreater-fool-Game,意为“下家都是比你更大的傻瓜”。“羊群效应”也叫“从众效应”:是个人的观念或行为由于真实的或想像的群体的影响或压力,而向与多数人相一致的方向变化的现象。表现为对特定的或临时的情境中的优势观念和行为方式的采纳(随潮)表现为对长期性的占优势地位的观念和行为方式的接受(顺应风俗习惯)。人们会追随大众所同意的,将自己的意见默认否定,且不会主观上思考事件的意义. 羊群是一种很散乱的组织,平时在一起也是盲目地左冲右撞,但一旦有一只头羊动起来,其他的羊也会不假思索地一哄而上,全然不顾前面可能有狼或者不远处有更好的草。因此,“羊群效应”就是比喻人都有一种从众心理,从众心理很容易导致盲从,而盲从往往会陷入骗局或遭到失败。
You're 纳税人 - I can see your point and your frustration - that's what I intended to say in the post -
That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起. Scientists need to take the responsibility to explain to tax payers - Whatever taken will be getting back to tax payers in what way - let the public trust scientists.
博主回复(2015-10-30 13:11):That's true - Science was conducted by elites, who used their own money. Now, science is a job - some scientists don't think much about tax payers' benefit. My point was to hope the public start to 解读屠呦呦施一公, like science - that's really 中国崛起.