回复：As to Why Chinese don't have innovation?

"The thing about China though is that it has always been an extremely brutal and frequently dysfunctional tyranny. Chinese simply aren't Americans. We don't need or want them in any significant numbers. Same holds for Japanese and Koreans. Ignoring the intelligence issue, there are huge differences in character and temperament. Chinese and Japanese both are rigid conformists who worship power. In other words they are natural Leftists. So I may have a few details wrong, but the fact remains that the Chinese and Japanese have never been even close to Europeans in innovation and flexible adaptability.

During WWII we began defeating the Japanese decisively long before we had quantitative or qualitative superiority. We were winning the war of attrition in the air with F4F Wildcats, P-40s and P-39s which were all initially helpless against the Japanese fighter planes. On the ground, at sea and in the air we quickly rebounded, and it was all because of innovations and adaptations with existing equipment by the guys actually using that equipment. The high command welcomed these innovations and made sure they were spread around.

We began sinking Japanese ships using skip bombing which was invented in the field by pilots flying medium bombers.

Our defeat of Japan is a monument to the initiative of the individual and the flexibility of higher command. This was just another example in a long, long history of European superiority in systems and organization that allowed them to conquer the world long before the industrial revolution made Europeans into something like supermen."

SOURCE IS THE SAME AS ABOVE.

Please don't be too sensitive about the post. It's just one's opinoin. only one side of Chinese , or Japanese or Koreanese culture.

所有跟帖： 

• analytical's writing is a little hard to comprehend, -lilipp- ♀ (550 bytes) () 03/10/2013 postreply 19:48:53

• 再多也没用。都得听别人的。 -lilipp- ♀ (0 bytes) () 03/10/2013 postreply 19:56:49