Simple opinion on the Burden of Evidence

Simple opinion on the Burden of Evidence

by Limin Wang

Dec. 10, 2020, Thu

In the legal cases about election frauds in the 2020 presidential election, the accessible facts/evidence found by the plaintiffs, the Trump campaign as well as some states and some people, have been presented. The Legal system and the authorities have the responsibility and resources to investigate to find more facts/evidence either for or against the plaintiff's allegations, right? When such a DO-NOTHING corrupt system does not VIEW the FACTS/EVIDENCE as FACTS/EVIDENCE, does not (seriously) investigate for more facts/evidence either for or neutral or against the allegations, but only claim their COUTNER-ALLEGATIONS, isn't such a system is a PHONY? Trump is the President of the U.S.A. and a rich dude, so he is supposed to have tremendous resources to find and present facts/evidence, but he is still being tossed by some "judges" in such a "judicial" system by such ways, then think about what kind of fvvk "justice" a poor common victim with little or no resource can get from such a PHONY system?

 

更多我的博客文章>>>

 

 

• JOKE: No merit of complaining election fraud in year 2020
• I strongly appeal for the stimulus bill to help INDIVIDUALS and
• Let We The People COUNT
• 评Dr. Scott Atlas请辞总统防疫顾问
• NYS WCB Case# G2029240: \'Dr. Benjamin S. Uh\' is again on \'Sur

所有跟帖： 

• +1. They should at least investigate. -Uusequery- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/10/2020 postreply 21:16:24

• Who is "they"? Does Barr's DOJ count? -118ibm- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/10/2020 postreply 21:19:06

• you are so smart to get the clue on your own now. -王利民- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/10/2020 postreply 21:31:22