太矛盾啦

Nadler says Article 1 of impeachment will charge "abuse of power" by the president, and Article 2 will charge him with "concealing evidence" about how he abused his power. Wait. If you don't have the evidence, how can you charge Article 1? Seems the articles cancel each other out

所有跟帖： 

• 证据不只一个，程度各不相同 -山中农夫- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/10/2019 postreply 15:21:10

• 虽然在总统妨碍国会的情况下, 国会仍然收集到了overwhelming的证据. -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/10/2019 postreply 15:38:52

• 嗯，与川普比，拜登跟白莲花似的。 -30512- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/10/2019 postreply 16:00:04

• 如果拜登有问题， 那是司法部的事，直到今天司法部长也没立案 -SwiperTheFox- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/10/2019 postreply 16:15:36

• 对了，怎么不是利益交换，打击政敌，或者贿赂了？ -30512- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/10/2019 postreply 16:01:48

• zhu当然有本事收集到overwhelming像steel dossier 那样的证据啦 -bustout- ♀ (0 bytes) () 12/10/2019 postreply 16:04:32