加拿大旅客比较中国较差的四川云南和印度最美丽的城市以及新德里,

来源: mrict. 2015-05-17 14:52:56 [] [旧帖] [给我悄悄话] 本文已被阅读: 次 (2346 bytes)
加拿大网友:      

I just took a 3-week road trip in Chinas relatively poor Sichuan and Yunnan provinces, immediately followed by a 3-week road trip in Indias Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh surrounding its capital Delhi. The contrast between the two countries could not have been greater: China has gleaming new highways even in remote mountainous areas, beautiful new urban parks and landscaped streets in even minor cities like Xichang and Miyi that few foreigners have heard of, and no visible abject poverty anywhere urban or rural. India was the complete opposite: congested potholed roads everywhere, homeless people sleeping in roadside tents in cities and villages, and even in Udaipur, reputedly Indias most beautiful city, you cannot walk a few steps in its streets without stepping on cow dung or being run over by a tuk tuk. Not to mention Agra, which is literally an open sewer as soon as you step outside the gates of the Taj Mahal.   

      From my personal experience, I have to agree with the author and make the conclusion that he dared not state openly: although we would like to believe otherwise, the Chinese totalitarianism has worked out far better for its people than the Indian democracy.   

我刚花了3个星期的时间,在中国相对较差的四川, 云南等省自驾游,紧跟一个3周的自驾游在印度的拉贾斯坦邦和北方邦邻近首都新德里。

两国之间的差异已经大的不能再大了:中国在即使是很小的城市,如西昌, 米易,都有闪闪发光的新公路,即使在很少有外国人听说的偏远的山区,美丽的新城市公园和风景优美的街道,随时随地城市或农村你看不到有明显的赤贫。

印度是 完全相反的:拥挤的凹凸不平的道路随处可见,无家可归的人睡在路边帐篷里的城市和村庄,甚至在乌代布尔,据说印度最美丽的城市,你不可能走在街上几步而没 有踩到牛粪。更何只要你踏一步就到泰姬陵的大门之外的阿格拉,这就是一个开放的下水道。从我个人的经验来说,我不得不做出的结论是:中国的极权主义比印度 的民主要强得太多了。

所有跟帖: 

CNN从来看不到这, 也永远不会看. -winxue11- 给 winxue11 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/17/2015 postreply 16:11:32

True. -2544- 给 2544 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/17/2015 postreply 16:23:02

08本人都抱怨媒体不公:骚乱报导一大片,仔细一看就那几张照片。 -coolgur- 给 coolgur 发送悄悄话 (6 bytes) () 05/17/2015 postreply 16:20:24

过了,中国比印度发展得强,不是因为中国是极权印度是民主。中国的极权政府干得不坏,但不是极权制度不坏。这得两说着。 -walkalong- 给 walkalong 发送悄悄话 walkalong 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 05/17/2015 postreply 16:38:22

这什么逻辑。干得好的政府就是好政府。 -////- 给 //// 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/17/2015 postreply 17:30:30

我是这么看的,用合理的方式运用权力((地利)来合理地组织人民(人和),并抓住了时机(天时),从而提高了人民的生活水平和长远的福祉 -人在异乡为异客- 给 人在异乡为异客 发送悄悄话 人在异乡为异客 的博客首页 (81 bytes) () 05/17/2015 postreply 17:45:25

政府的存在是为了它的人民。不管是何体制只要作的可以就好。 -thrawn- 给 thrawn 发送悄悄话 thrawn 的博客首页 (100 bytes) () 05/18/2015 postreply 17:31:47

中国政府并非“极权”政府。各国制度都是民主和集中的结合,只是结合比例和结合模式有区别。 -xwu622- 给 xwu622 发送悄悄话 xwu622 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 05/17/2015 postreply 18:20:40

“天天把民主当化妆品用的”这个形容好,有才! -娱乐三下- 给 娱乐三下 发送悄悄话 (0 bytes) () 05/17/2015 postreply 20:07:03

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!

发现Adblock插件

如要继续浏览
请支持本站 请务必在本站关闭/移除任何Adblock

关闭Adblock后 请点击

请参考如何关闭Adblock/Adblock plus

安装Adblock plus用户请点击浏览器图标
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”

安装Adblock用户请点击图标
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”