说西方 道西方 不得不说：
中国羽球健儿英雄，李永波男人一个~！
李永波 若 独包全揽： 我做的主 论罪 我谢罪 我就称他英雄！
什么是奥林匹克精神？
The Olympic spirit is best expressed in the Olympic Creed:
"The most important thing in the Olympic Games is not to win but to take part, just as the most important thing in life is not the triumph but the struggle. The essential thing is not to have conquered but to have fought well."
Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_spirit_of_the_olympic_games#ixzz22SrErk4t
wikipedia 这样说：
the term "Olympic spirit" is an oft-referred to but perhaps vaguely-defined concept
associated with the Olympic Games.
The mission of Olympic Spirit is
"to build a peaceful and better world in the Olympic Spirit
which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play -
也可以这样说 奥林匹克精神 没有一个 准确的官方的正式的定义！
Olympic Games 就是 努力进取竞争取胜的games
奥委会 国际羽联的不公平规则首先破坏了奥林匹克宗旨
中国羽球健儿为了战斗到最后 而 暂时消极应付 是被逼的 是战术和策略
这应当不是运动员自我的决定 而是 中国羽球代表团的团体决议
作为总教练 李永波 也是主要的决议人之一
我们应当 对这个决议理解支持
中国代表团选择 不上诉 服从组委会的决定 是： 1. 不得已，2. 敢作敢当
有正義感的英人的公道話：
Bravo to the Chinese badminton players
The truth of the matter is
that the actions of these badminton players are
in the spirit of the modern Olympics.
It is not a spectator sport
but a deeply serious competition for national pride.
The players should be congratulated
on their ingenuity.
http://bbs.wenxuecity.com/currentevent/501692.html
Bravo to the Chinese badminton players – they're just trying to win medals
Criticising a nation's athletes for wanting to win as many medals as possible is to forget what the Olympics is really about
Email
The attacks on Chinese and Korean badminton players are grossly unfair. They were doing their best with added cunning. Day and after day we read relentless hyperbole about the vital importance to national pride of winning: not winning a heat or a round or an exhibition, but winning medals. So obsessed is the media with this single index that the BBC has stopped displaying the medals table because it is too humiliating. This is the pastiche chauvinism of a banana republic.
Along come the Chinese, who clearly know how to win. You plan. The badminton heats were apparently staged to give an incentive, in certain circumstances, to losing games in the qualifying stages. Faced with the risk of a tougher opponent later and thus losing a medal, the players did what their tacticians said. They lost a round. I cannot see how, in sporting terms, this is any different from sprint cyclists hovering for an age on a curve, waiting for the right moment to surge forward. Anyway, the athletes were not trying to lose, they were losing so as being more likely to win.
The result on the night may have been depressing for the spectators, but no one was forcing them to watch. They would be the first to howl if a British team so messed up the qualifying rounds as to lose a medal. The concept of the Olympics as being not about winning but "about taking part" ended long ago. Modern Olympics are parodies of Hitler's nationalist games of 1936. They are a statist contest determined by who wins the most medals.
As for watching people lose, that can develop its own rules and excitement. As a boy I recall the most engrossing event at the village sports day was the slow bicycle race. The only rule was that you had to stay on your bike and could not go backwards. Three-legged races were similarly enjoyable, as was running backwards. It was only the swimmers who elevated not moving as fast as possible from A to B into an art, with backstroke, butterfly and such nonsense.
The truth of the matter is that the actions of these badminton players are in the spirit of the modern Olympics. It is not a spectator sport but a deeply serious competition for national pride. The players should be congratulated on their ingenuity.
【】
选择“Disable on www.wenxuecity.com”
选择“don't run on pages on this domain”
