ESPN paid Barkley to be controversial. He just say

whatever is possible to be dramatic. He said Yao is not a good rebounder, sure he's no Howard or Rodman or Barkley himself, but he's still 20-10. He said Tmac has low assists, sure he's no Nash or Kidd, but he's 20+ 5+ 5+ year in and year out. Only a hand full guys have that kind of all around game in the league in one year. None of them are best, but they are both very good players. I agree that TMac could be very useful, if he could set his mind straight. A big IF, but his trading value is just at all-time low. I would hate to see the trade to get a Lewis back. How is Yao supposed to win anything with that squard then? Someone just bang TMac's head, and wake him up.

所有跟帖： 

• actually Magic first mentioned about -smart- ♂ (182 bytes) () 12/21/2007 postreply 11:46:35

• I don't think it's professional for Magic to say that on nationa -Warsteiner- ♂ (189 bytes) () 12/21/2007 postreply 11:55:16

• honestly, I was surprised also, considering -smart- ♂ (179 bytes) () 12/21/2007 postreply 12:03:51

• 两位说得好，就觉得魔术师不太让人信服，更深为麦蝶可惜：） -有言- ♂ (0 bytes) () 12/21/2007 postreply 19:08:42